Financhill
Buy
76

CLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$129.67
Seasonality move :
2.68%
Day range:
$128.78 - $140.03
52-week range:
$36.00 - $144.27
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
34.68x
P/S ratio:
1.60x
P/B ratio:
7.94x
Volume:
5.2M
Avg. volume:
4.6M
1-year change:
256.71%
Market cap:
$15.1B
Revenue:
$9.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.74

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLS
Celestica
$2.6B $1.16 16% 31.44% $139.50
DELL
Dell Technologies
$23.8B $1.85 10.05% 52.74% $151.14
HPQ
HP
$13B $0.85 1.25% 19.56% $36.19
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$3M -$5.41 118.73% -99.59% --
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
-- -- -- -- --
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$1.3B $3.87 30.64% 1173.01% $420.60
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLS
Celestica
$129.70 $139.50 $15.1B 34.68x $0.00 0% 1.60x
DELL
Dell Technologies
$106.37 $151.14 $74.5B 18.62x $0.45 1.67% 0.82x
HPQ
HP
$32.27 $36.19 $30.3B 11.48x $0.29 3.46% 0.60x
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$4.65 -- $1.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.28x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$2.38 -- $11.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.04x
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$363.44 $420.60 $18.7B 49.45x $0.00 0% 4.04x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLS
Celestica
29.59% 1.798 7.43% 0.83x
DELL
Dell Technologies
110.05% 0.905 28.8% 0.43x
HPQ
HP
115.85% 1.536 28.99% 0.40x
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
26.36% -1.735 122.04% 0.36x
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
50.16% 11.504 426.14% 0.18x
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
38.8% 0.605 11.36% 0.89x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLS
Celestica
$297.2M $204.7M 16.94% 24.71% 7.91% $27.3M
DELL
Dell Technologies
$5.3B $1.7B 17.81% -- 7.06% $914M
HPQ
HP
$3B $1.1B 33.28% -- 7.18% $1.5B
SYTA
Siyata Mobile
$1.7M -$3.8M -197.89% -252.61% -1.69% -$7.6M
UAVS
AgEagle Aerial Systems
$1.6M -$1.9M -193.52% -275.7% -57.72% -$1.1M
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies
$613M $196M 7.12% 11.99% 14.34% $277M

Celestica vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or DELL?

    Dell Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 4.65%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Dell Technologies's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    21.78% $1.58 $22.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or DELL?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $139.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Dell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $151.14 which suggests that it could grow by 42.09%. Given that Dell Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Dell Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    7 1 0
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    13 3 0
  • Is CLS or DELL More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.606%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or DELL?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dell Technologies offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies pays out 33.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or DELL?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies quarterly revenues of $24.4B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than Dell Technologies's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.68x while Dell Technologies's PE ratio is 18.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.60x versus 0.82x for Dell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.60x 34.68x $2.5B $151.7M
    DELL
    Dell Technologies
    0.82x 18.62x $24.4B $1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or HPQ?

    HP has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 6.45%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat HP's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    HPQ
    HP
    21.35% $0.93 $8.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $139.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand HP has an analysts' consensus of $36.19 which suggests that it could grow by 12.16%. Given that HP has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe HP is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    7 1 0
    HPQ
    HP
    2 12 1
  • Is CLS or HPQ More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HP has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.153%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HP offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP pays out 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or HPQ?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than HP quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is lower than HP's net income of $906M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.68x while HP's PE ratio is 11.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.60x versus 0.60x for HP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.60x 34.68x $2.5B $151.7M
    HPQ
    HP
    0.60x 11.48x $14.1B $906M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or SYTA?

    Siyata Mobile has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -10.68%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Siyata Mobile's return on equity of -252.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    29.04% -$0.22 $13.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $139.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Siyata Mobile has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26902.52%. Given that Siyata Mobile has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Siyata Mobile is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    7 1 0
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    0 1 0
  • Is CLS or SYTA More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siyata Mobile has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.57%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siyata Mobile offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siyata Mobile pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or SYTA?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Siyata Mobile quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than Siyata Mobile's net income of -$626.3K. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.68x while Siyata Mobile's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.60x versus 0.28x for Siyata Mobile. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.60x 34.68x $2.5B $151.7M
    SYTA
    Siyata Mobile
    0.28x -- $5.9M -$626.3K
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or UAVS?

    AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of -105.32%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    49.75% -$16.03 $12.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $139.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 687.82%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    7 1 0
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0 0 0
  • Is CLS or UAVS More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.45%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or UAVS?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.68x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.60x versus 0.04x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.60x 34.68x $2.5B $151.7M
    UAVS
    AgEagle Aerial Systems
    0.04x -- $3.3M -$3.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CLS or ZBRA?

    Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 5.96% compared to Celestica's net margin of 10.92%. Celestica's return on equity of 24.71% beat Zebra Technologies's return on equity of 11.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLS
    Celestica
    11.68% $1.29 $2.7B
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    48.85% $2.64 $5.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica has a consensus price target of $139.50, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Zebra Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $420.60 which suggests that it could grow by 15.73%. Given that Zebra Technologies has higher upside potential than Celestica, analysts believe Zebra Technologies is more attractive than Celestica.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLS
    Celestica
    7 1 0
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    8 10 0
  • Is CLS or ZBRA More Risky?

    Celestica has a beta of 2.275, which suggesting that the stock is 127.487% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.128%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zebra Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celestica pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zebra Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLS or ZBRA?

    Celestica quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Zebra Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Celestica's net income of $151.7M is higher than Zebra Technologies's net income of $137M. Notably, Celestica's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.68x while Zebra Technologies's PE ratio is 49.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celestica is 1.60x versus 4.04x for Zebra Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLS
    Celestica
    1.60x 34.68x $2.5B $151.7M
    ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies
    4.04x 49.45x $1.3B $137M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Stanley Druckenmiller’s Bet on Huntington Bancshares
Stanley Druckenmiller’s Bet on Huntington Bancshares

Stanley Druckenmiller is renowned for his macro-driven investment style –…

Market Concentration and S&P 500 Performance: 50-Year Analysis
Market Concentration and S&P 500 Performance: 50-Year Analysis

Market concentration refers to periods when a few stocks or…

What Is Anchoring Bias In Investing?
What Is Anchoring Bias In Investing?

Anchoring bias is a cognitive effect that makes the first…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 109x

Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
100
DOCS alert for Feb 8

Doximity [DOCS] is up 35.93% over the past day.

Sell
32
BILL alert for Feb 8

BILL Holdings [BILL] is down 35.52% over the past day.

Buy
72
LEU alert for Feb 8

Centrus Energy [LEU] is up 32.97% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock